Interreligious dialogue based on the covenant

Author

Department of comparative Religions and Mysticism, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Zahedan. Iran

Abstract

Although theoretical approaches are necessary in interfaith dialogues, they are not sufficient. It is better to proceed with a real experience based on the teachings related to the roots of religions. This can happen in practice based on spirituality and by relying on the inner aspects of religions and also by overcoming the limitations of personal beliefs and with a positive attitude towards all religions and respecting other believers. In this context, monotheism can be a suitable basis for dialogues between religions, but the fact is that the theology of religions is the subject of many debates in terms of epistemology, and as a result, as an issue, it needs more studies and discussions. Worship can also be considered as the common basis of religions. But worship with different manifestations is basically a personal relationship and a kind of inner encounter with God, and its content is basically a personal experience. But the doctrine of "covenant" is very clear, especially in the main Abrahamic religions, and it needs less explanation than some theological doctrines. In addition to this, the covenant doctrine is common in our daily lives on a smaller scale, and its meaning, concept, and role in social life are more or less clear to everyone.
 

Keywords

References

Akasheh, Khaled (1999) "The Theological Foundations of the Interfaith Dialogue, "Vincentiana: Vol. 43: No. 4, Article 12. Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/vincentiana/vol43/iss4/12
Allison Charles. S, (2016), The Significance of Blood Sacrifice in the Old Testament, Africa Reasearch Reveiw, Ethiopia Vol. 10(1), Serial No.40, January, 46-60
Bradley Shingle ton, In Search of Common Ground: The Role of a Global Ethic in Inter-Religious Dialogue.2008.
 https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/ethics_online/0023
Brinig Margaret & Nock Steven L., (2004) What does covenant mean for relationships, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 137. Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/1438
Campbell, w. (1984). Christianity and Judaism: Continuity and Discontinuity. International Bulletin of Missionary Research.
H.Essex, K. (1999). The Abrahamic covenant. The Master's Seminary Journal 10.2 https://tms.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/tmsj10n.pdf
http://www.osservatoreromano.va/en/news/compassion-and-mercy-keys-to-interreligious-dialog
Lafon Guy. (2004). Une foi d'alliance. À propos de Jean 1, Revue théologique de Louvain, 35ᵉ année, fasc. 2, pp. 217-229.
Lumbard, Joseph E.B. (2015). Covenant and Covenants in the Qur’an. Journal of Qur’anic Studies 17.2, 1–23 Edinburgh University Press.
Malcolm. Smith, (2002). The Power of the Blood Covenant- Uncover the Secret Strength in God's Eternal Oath, Harrison House, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Mweemba, G. (2010). The Covenant under Threat of the Baal Fertility Cult: A Historical Theological Study, Thesis in Dictionary of Theology, University of South Africa.
Neighbor-Love as a Keystone to Christian-Muslim Dialogue 20-Sacred Heart University, stiltnerb@sacredheart.eduT 2013
Rendtorff Rolf. (2000) The Covenant Formula: An Exegetical and Theological Investigation,ISBN-9780567086051,Publisher:BloomsburyAcademic 
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=9780567086051&i=stripbooks&linkCode=qs
Comparative Study of Religions and Mysticism
Volume 6, Issue 2
March 2023
Pages 133-159

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 March 2023
  • Accept Date: 15 March 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics