The Origins of Buddhist Doctrine of Devasatya (Two Truths) and It’s Repercussion in Nāgārjuna’s Point of View

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Corresponding Author, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Religions and Mysticism, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

The doctrine of Devasatya or the Two Truths, holds significant prominence within Buddhist philosophy, particularly among the philosophers of the Mādhyamaka and Yogācāra schools. According to this doctrine, reality can be broadly categorized into two principal types: 1- conventional truth (saṁvṛtisatya) and 2- Ultimate truth (paramārthasatya). This study employs a descriptive-analytical methodology with a historical perspective to explore three critical issues related to the doctrine of the Two Truths: a- its origins, b- its early developments, and c- its reflection in the thought of Nāgārjuna, the founder of the Mahāyāna Mādhyamaka school. In summary, the origins of the Two Truths doctrine can be traced to various ways of liberation within Hinduism, while also being influenced by the distinction made between definitive and interpretative statements of Buddha in the Pāli Canon. Subsequently, both Theravāda commentators and scholars from the Sautrāntika and Sarvāstivāda schools transitioned this previously hermeneutical discourse into ontological discussions, thereby providing the initial formulations of the Two Truths doctrine. Afterwards, Nāgārjuna posited this doctrine as a foundational principle of Buddhist teachings, elaborating on its cognitive and ontological dimensions. According to his perspective, conventional truth pertains to everyday understanding and the apparent teachings of the Buddha, whereas ultimate truth refers to the concept of śūnyatā or the emptiness of phenomena from inherent essence and independent, unconditional existence.

Keywords


Anderson, Carol (2013), Pain and Its Ending: The Four Noble Truths in the Theravāda Buddhist Canon, London: Routledge.
Aṅguttarra Nikāya: The Numerical Discourses of The Buddha (2012), translated by Bodhi Bhikkhu, Wisdom Pub.
Āryadeva (2008), Four hundred Stanzas on the Middle Way, Translated and Commentary by Gyel-tsap, New York: Snow Lion Publications.
Chandrakirti (1979), Prasannapadā: Lucid Exposition of the Middle Way, Translated by Mervyn Sprung, Prajñā Press.
Chandrakirti (2000-2001), Madhyamakavatara &Madhyamakavatarabhashyam, Translated by V. G. Churinoff, et.al, FPMT Masters Program Material.
Conze, Edward (1962). Buddhist Thought in India, London: George Allen & Unwin LTD.
Dasgupta, Surendranath (1975), A History of Indian Philosophy, Vol I, Cambridge.
Deussen, Paul (1906), The Philosophy of Upanishads, Translated by Rev Geden, Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Dhammapada, (1950). Trans by S. Radhakrishnan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dhammapala, Acariya. (1996). A treatise on the Pāramīs, translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.
Eckel, M. D. (1992): Jnānagarbha on the Two Truths, Motilal Banarsidass.
Eckel, M. D. (1994), To See the Buddha: A Philosopher’s Quest for the Meaning of Emptiness, Princeton University Press.
Eckel, M. D. (2016), “Two Truths and the Structure of the Bodhisattva Path in ‘The Introduction to the Nectar Reality’”, in International Workshop on Bhāviveka and the Two Truths, Ryukokou University.
Fatone, Vicente (1991), The Philosophy of Nāgārjuna, Delhi.
Flood, Gavin (2018), An Introduction to Hinduism, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Garfield, Jay (2001), Empty Words, New York: Oxford University Press.
Gethin, Rupert (1998). The Foundations of Buddhism, Oxford: Oxford University press.
Harvey, Peter (2012), An Introduction to Buddhism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hindery, Roderick (1996). Comparative ethics in Hindu and Buddhist traditions. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. 
Holdrege, Barbara (2004). "Dharma". In The Hindu world. Edited by Sushil Mittal & G. R. Thursby,  New York: Routledge.
Hopkins, Jeffrey (1996), Meditation on Emptiness, Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Kalupahana, David (1992). A History of Buddhist Philosophy, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Karunadasa, Y. (1996), The Dhamma Theory: Philosophical Cornerstone of the Abhidhamma, Wheel Publication 412/413. Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.
Karunadasa, Y. (2019), The Thravāda Abhidhamma, USA: Wisdom Pub.
Keith, Arthur. B. (1925), The Religion and Philosophy of the Veda and Upanishads, Oxford.
Klostermaier, Klaus (1989). A Survey of Hinduism. New York: State University of NY Press.
Matilal, Bimal Krishna (2002). Ganeri, Jonardon (ed.). The Collected Essays of Bimal Krishna Matilal, Volume 1. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Monier-Williams, Monier; Leumann, Ernst; Cappeller, Carl, (1899). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Murti, T. R. V. (1973), “Saṃvŗti and Paramārtha in Madhyamoka and Advaita Vedānta”, in The Problem of Two Truths in Buddhism and Vedānta, Edited by M. Sprung, Boston, 9-26.
Nāgārjuna (1995), The Fundamental Wisdom of Middle Way: Nāgārjuna’s Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, Translated and Commentary by Jay L. Garfield, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nāgārjuna (1999), Nāgārjuna’s ‘Seventy Stanzas’, translation and commentary by G. S. Rinchen & D. R. Komito, New York: Snow Lion Pubs.
Nāgārjuna (2010),Vigrahavyāvartanī: The Dispeller of Disputes (2010), Translated and Commented by Jan Westerhoff, Oxford: University of Oxford.
Nāgārjuna (2013), Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way: Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, Translated by M. Siderits & Sh. Katsura, United States of America, Wisdom Pub.
Newland, Guy (1999), Appearance and Reality: The Two Truths in Four Buddhist Systems, New York, Snow Lion Pubs.
Nirvāna-Sutra, Mahaparinirvana-Sutra (2013). Translated by Mark Blum, Vol I, USA: Bukkyo Dendo Kyokai America.
Rospatt, Alexander (1995), The Buddhist Doctrine of Momentariness, Stuttgart.
Samyutta Nikãya: The Connected Discourse of the Buddha (2003). Translated by Bhikkhu Bodhi, Boston: Wisdom Publications.
Siderits, Mark (2003), “On the Soteriological Significance of Emptiness”, An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(1), 9-23.
Sprung, M. (edi: 1973), The Problem of Two Truths in Buddhism and Vedānta, Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Stcherbatsky, TH (1923). The Central Conception of Buddhism and the Meaning of the Word ‘Dharma’, London: Royal Asiatic Society.
Streng, F. J. (1973), “The Significance of Pratityasamutpāda for Understanding the Relationship between Samvŗti and Paramārthasatya in Nāgārjuna” in The Problem of Two Truths in Buddhism and Vedānta, Edited by M. Sprung, Boston, 27-39.
Thakchoe, Sonam (2018), “The Two Truths in Madhyamaka: Jñānagarbha”, in The Routledge History of Indian Philosophy, edited by Purushottama Bilimoria, London & NY, Routledge.
Thakchoe, Sonam (2023), The Two Truths in Indian Buddhism: Reality, Knowledge and Freedom, Wisdom Publication.
Thakchoe, Sonam, (2024), "The Theory of Two Truths in India", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2024 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/twotruths-india/>.
Tiwari, Kedar Nath (1998), Classical Indian Ethical Thought. Motilal Banarsidass.
Upanishads (1968), Translated By S. Radhakrishnan, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
Ward, C. H. S (1947). Buddhism: Hinayana, London: Epworth Press.
Westerhoff, Jan (2016), “On the Nihilist Interpretation of Madhyamaka”, Journal of Indian Philosophy, 44/2, pp. 337-376.
Westerhoff, Jan (2018), The Golden Age of Indian Buddhist Philosophy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Paul; Tribe, Anthony; Wynne, Alexander (2002), Buddhist Thought, Taylor & Francis.