نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته ادیان و عرفان، گروه اللهیات، واحد آیت الله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آمل، ایران
2 استادیار رشته ادیان و عرفان، گروه الهیات، واحد آیت الله آملی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آمل، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Man and his nature are among the most important concepts in different schools of thought and religion, which have been the subject of various debates. Based on this, from Iran and ancient Greece to the modern era and in different religions from Zoroastrianism to Islam, various topics and views have emerged about man and his nature. In such a way that different thinkers, whether Western or Islamic, have reached different results throughout history to investigate and explain these concepts by adhering to the different foundations and methods they have taken. What forms the main question in this article is: What are the most important commonalities and differences between Zoroastrianism and Sohravardi's wisdom in the discussion of human nature? The hypothesis of our research is that man and his nature are more based on moral and religious teachings (religion of ancient Iran) according to Zoroaster and more philosophical and based on Islamic teachings according to Sheikh Eshraq. In the wisdom of human illumination, it is a fusion of the soul and body and of the light of light (a simple and single essence) that is original with him. This article examines Zarathustra's and Sheikh al-Ishraq's attitude towards man and his existential nature with inferential analytical method. In Zoroastrian's teachings, man is not a being who is powerless and his destiny is predetermined for him and he does not have a role in it. In the radiant wisdom of man, who is the unit of the levels of enlightenment, due to his special creation, he has different authorities of knowledge and exaltation in different levels of his existence, and he can also remain in the lower levels and the world of divers.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)